New Rule in the War: Victory on Mammoth

Ioioluk: We’re losing! Somebody think of something to get us to win.

Tylund/Ana: Claim Funks said we can’t use allies

Ioioluk: ACP LOSE, IW WAS IN FORTS DOING NOTHING!

LT using allies

~

Hai ACP,

The new rule is that the LT cannot invade the ACP! We made this new rules because the LT made up a rule that we can’t use allies – so now we made up a rule that LT cannot invade. To be honest, we were fed up with LT’s behaviour and how they were scheduling constant invasions because they have no lives. So until LT admits that they lost Mammoth and we can use allies – the LT cannot invade us. We will withdraw our “rule” if LT withdraw their “rule”.

Here are the pictures:

Above: After battle with IW at Dojo

We averaged 35-40 at this event so this was worth FIVE CLOVERS. This was led by Ek, Emp and I, with Ant leading the prebattle for a bit. The LT again had to use exuses to claim victory while knowing we crushed them in this battle. Remember, the events are still on and I was merly being sarcastic in the first paragraph. It was to prove a point, LT can’t make up rules. Even if I agreed to it then, I don’t agree to it now and for the rule to be valid BOTH armies have to agree to it.

Kingfunks4 // Army of CP Leader

41 responses to “New Rule in the War: Victory on Mammoth”

  1. 1st and i made it as u know.Did i do ok?.THANKS F U N K S your a legend

    1. Lol the “Army of Club Penguin [ACP] Biggest Army 2006-Present” is too afraid to fight LT without allies. I love this.

  2. dammit i had to vacuum the house

    1. Blizzard880 Avatar
      Blizzard880

      ur retired get lost

      1. Emp mobile Avatar
        Emp mobile

        He’s not retired, lol

      2. ^

      3. ∂aятн ρяσ∂ιтσя|||тнє cσηqυєяσя|||ST/๑ۣۜۜŦł|||яєνaη'ѕ aρρяєηтιcє||| Avatar
        ∂aятн ρяσ∂ιтσя|||тнє cσηqυєяσя|||ST/๑ۣۜۜŦł|||яєνaη’ѕ aρρяєηтιcє|||

        XD

  3. IOIO WASENT EVEN ONLINE

  4. The LT again had to use exuses to claim victory while knowing we crushed them in this battle. what is exuses? LEARN SPELLING

    Ek: Excuses*

    1. Are you referring to the battle which ACP got 30 against LT who had 15? 3 minutes into the battle, LT logged off because they realised IW wished to attack them. If you mean that battle then yeh, we won.

  5. Yeah sorry I missed it, I was on another chat and I lost track of time.

  6. “so now we made up a rule that LT cannot invade. To be honest, we were fed up with LT’s behaviour” BEHAVOUR?!??!?! LEARN HOW TO SPELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

    1. pengy7778 im a sentor Avatar
      pengy7778 im a sentor

      ^a 5 year old that dosent know how to spell

    2. Wow, you must really love ACP to study our posts that carefully… *chew* And I would take a look at your own site first. People wouldn’t be able to scroll down if you corrected LT’s grammar

      1. Btw Thanks for letting me re join F U N K S empoleon7667 ekpenguin9 qwerty and asdfghjkl.YOUR ALL LEGENDS

      2. Haha. Enjoy yourself 😀

      3. do i have to join acptr cos im already pretty experienced?

  7. BRIG. GENERAL CAMPLAZLO3 Avatar
    BRIG. GENERAL CAMPLAZLO3

    honestly man i dont think we need allies because weve beaten LT before and we can without doubt do it again. i also think that since LT cant invade us then why dont they just surrender right now? and sorry i couldnt make it to the battle today, i own my own landscaping business and im going to be busy with that for a little while, but on my lunch hour ill try to make it to the battles

  8. In war, it’s not your choice if they can invade or not. That would be like saying to Germans in WW2: ” We made a new rule saying you can’t invade any of us so yeah” They. Are. Your. Enemies.

    1. Just as you can’t refrain an army who is attacking you to get off said server.

  9. Empoleon7667 (Emp) Avatar
    Empoleon7667 (Emp)

    Came

  10. whoa look at all the lies on this post. example :

    “Ioioluk: We’re losing! Somebody think of something to get us to win.
    Tylund/Ana: Claim Funks said we can’t use allies
    Ioioluk: ACP LOSE, IW WAS IN FORTS DOING NOTHING”

    whoa, idiot, i wasn’t at the battle.

    1. Blizzard880 Avatar
      Blizzard880

      Stupid UK idiot.

      1. pengy7778 im a sentor Avatar
        pengy7778 im a sentor

        troll your own failing army ioioluk

  11. i was there

    1. shut up ioio

  12. ÐЯ.ZłЯ0 Avatar
    ÐЯ.ZłЯ0

    Lol this post proves LT right because of how you can imagine Funks crying.

    1. Emp mobile Avatar
      Emp mobile

      It doesn’t prove anything but us winning?

    2. That comment didn’t help any argument you originally had whatsoever.

      1. ÐЯ.ZłЯ0 Avatar
        ÐЯ.ZłЯ0

        Phrased it wrong 😛

  13. Emp mobile Avatar
    Emp mobile

    For all you LT out there, the Ioio thing does not imply Ioio being at the battle.

    1. Yes, it actually does. If somebody is saying something during the battle, they must first be there. That’s just common sense.

  14. Swat Bandit Avatar
    Swat Bandit

    Made it.

  15. ben 92763 1st lieutenant Avatar
    ben 92763 1st lieutenant

    i came

  16. “LT using allies”
    -pic of random red army-
    -acp troops are in that red army-
    wtf? are you kidding me?

  17. 😛 pie rules

  18. Oh, I forgot. Made it 😀

  19. i was there 😀

  20. Fail, Ioio wasn’t at that battle.

    1. Also, ACP cannot render the rules valid or invalid when it suits them. Dirtbag move.

Leave a Reply