Join ACP

Succession Legitimacy Bill

oagalthorp
51 comments on Succession Legitimacy Bill

Oagal’s edit #2: Anyway, more people voted and “yes” is in the lead again. So there’s no need for debate. :mrgreen:

Oagal’s edit #1: Someone (Meat? 🙄 (THAT IDIOT)) screwed up the poll. How do we know this? The “Yes to No” ratio went from approximately 85(yes):15(no) to 85(yes):100+(no) in less than five minutes. Where ever did these 75+ votes come from?? 😮 To make matters more fishy, there were no additional votes for any option besides “no”. Coincidence? I think not. The poll was hacked.

So, unless anyone with a substantial argument objects, we are going to pass the Succession Legitimacy Bill. Nice try Meat. 😉

Read Tomtwelve’s retirement post HERE!

In light of recent leadership disputes, Boomer and I (Oagal–the guy who made this army, for those of you who don’t know :roll:) have decided to propose a new Bill: The Succession Legitimacy Bill. Here are the conditions:

  • The latest retiring leader of the ACP holds the right to choose how the next leader will be selected. The retiring leader can choose to hold an election or simply hand-pick his/her successor, or whatever he/she wants.
  • The retiring leader loses this right if he/she has been overthrown or determined inept by Oagalthorp and Boomer. The qualification for ineptness include–but are not limited to–an obvious lack of care for the wellbeing of the ACP and the unwarranted destruction or loss of ACP property, such as pages on the website or ACP-owned servers.

Vote here:

Written by

oagalthorp

View all 356 posts

51 responses to “Succession Legitimacy Bill”

  1. oagalthorp Avatar
    oagalthorp

    FYI the last option exists to weed out people whose opinions don’t matter. :mrgreen:

    Reply
  2. freddy257 Avatar
    freddy257

    i agree

    Reply
  3. Omega90 Avatar
    Omega90

    Nice i agree 😀

    Reply
  4. ///Maxthepen/// Avatar
    ///Maxthepen///

    lmao oagal xd

    Reply
  5. тнσмαѕ0270 Avatar
    тнσмαѕ0270

    2ND??

    Reply
  6. «●●●ƒσχтαιℓѕ●●●» Avatar
    «●●●ƒσχтαιℓѕ●●●»

    “The latest retiring leader of the ACP hold the right to choose how the next leader will be selected. The retiring leader can choose to hold an election or simply hand-pick his/her successor, or whatever he/she wants.”

    I want partial credit for that part. I thought of that first, and suggested it at a senate meeting, but Dry veto-ed it.

    BTW- I’m not an editor. Gotta fix that =\
    Oagal: This is the way I had things set up from the start–in no way is it a “new” idea.
    P.S. Ask Boomer for Editorship. He’s your leader :mrgreen:

    Fox: Ha! Dum- I mean.. GREAT minds think alike. That’s why Meat and I think so differently. My mind is too great 😛

    Reply
  7. ///Maxthepen/// Avatar
    ///Maxthepen///

    I voted for Im Awesome 8)

    Reply
  8. «●●●ƒσχтαιℓѕ●●●» Avatar
    «●●●ƒσχтαιℓѕ●●●»

    Boomer lost Mammoth. Does that make him inept? :mrgreen:
    Oagal: No, that was originally Aber. Then Meat. See what I mean?

    Boomer: I think it was Aber’s idea to make it neutral, and Fort accepted.
    Fox: Well Meat’s an idiot…. Sorry Meat xDD

    Oagal #2: Well Fort and Aber are the same person, and Aber controls the brain (Fort’s p-whipped :)). And Meat had an oportunity to claim Mammoth after winning it back, but said “it’s staying neutral.” 🙄

    Reply
  9. tomtwelve Avatar
    tomtwelve

    yeah it’s true. this has been going on for longer than you know… (suspenseful music plays)

    Reply
  10. dryvitacp Avatar
    dryvitacp

    Fox you wanted an election . PERIOD. yes I vetoed that. I would gladly stand up, in the Senate and veto it today, cause there aint no doubt I love this army…..God bless the ACP!

    Fox: Here’s the exact bill I gave, Dry, tell me that’s me wanting an election “PERIOD.”

    “I think all leaders (Leaders as in highest leaders – not 2ic and 3ic) should be able to choose whether a selection or an election successes them. Then, leaders who don’t like elections such as Meat could just choose their successors, and leaders like me who think elections should be tried once again could offer an election. (Of course, this bill could be changed or cancelled if cheating occurred and the cheaters could be penalized.)”

    I stated quite clearly it was the leaders decision – NOT SPECIFICALLY AN ELECTION.

    Reply
  11. Mchappy2 Avatar
    Mchappy2

    Nice Bill 8) !

    Reply
  12. ~βã↑ιη↑Γéη€Ηé™ The ACP Div Gen Avatar
    ~βã↑ιη↑Γéη€Ηé™ The ACP Div Gen

    i voted yes but i agree with that AND the last one (8ball)

    Reply
  13. tomtwelve Avatar
    tomtwelve

    retirement post of tomtwelve
    http://tomtwelve.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/tomtwelve-retires-from-acp/

    Reply
  14. Ctar17 Avatar
    Ctar17

    I agree 100% wit this. Rofl at the fact that Seane tried to regain leadership of ACP. Guess he is going into the ACP Hall Of Shame.

    Reply
  15. Kg 007 Avatar
    Kg 007

    Instead of having Oagal and Boomer pick the new leader, i think that the senate should. It’ll give the senate something to do and it would reflect what the soldiers in the acp want.
    Oagal: Oagal and Boomer don’t pick the new leader. The current leader does. Read the Bill

    Reply
  16. รtєคк คкค คχєש๏lยtเ๏ภ™ Avatar
    รtєคк คкค คχєש๏lยtเ๏ภ™

    But in some cases it can just be the popularity vote.

    Reply
  17. Leaderbird Avatar
    Leaderbird

    nice oagal… Oagal will you be the next leader…

    Fox: NO PLEASE NO I DON’T LIKE FIVE PATROLS A DAY NOOO

    Reply
  18. 77 hockey Avatar
    77 hockey

    I’m awesome B-)

    yes, yes i am

    TEEMU AHONEN

    Reply
  19. itunesgeek1 Avatar
    itunesgeek1

    stupid meat

    Reply
  20. Kg 007 Avatar
    Kg 007

    Okay, but I think that the senate should vote to see if the ruler is inept.

    Reply
  21. jedimaster17 Avatar
    jedimaster17

    A good piece of legislation.
    Kg, the Senate could be biased towards the “ruler”. It makes sense to have unbiased judges who are only concerned with the well being of ACP, rather than the pawns of an inept leader.

    ~Jedi

    Oagal: 🙂

    Reply
  22. Seanehawk aka Meat Avatar
    Seanehawk aka Meat

    I’m naked 😛

    Ohmaiholybajeezus.

    Oagal: Wow, this comment really helped that last shed of dignity you had after screwing yourself over.

    Reply
  23. obiwan4321 Avatar
    obiwan4321

    i think it should be election

    Reply
  24. baconwaffle Avatar
    baconwaffle

    I have made a new and better army up cpa the cpa team is YELLOW! and we attack the acp as our enemeys we beat the agents 5 times and we destroy armys!

    Reply
  25. Stton Avatar
    Stton

    only noobs pick ‘NO’ cause they want to be leader.. WELL IT AINT GONNA HAPPEN YA SADDO…. even if they did they wouldn’t know what to do they think its all about PB’s, Battles, and WAR, but it got meetings, elections, leadership, stuff like that so vote yes on the poll, not for me, not for your parents, but for ACP.

    Reply
  26. Antarcticold Avatar
    Antarcticold

    Hi Everyone
    I agree that Meat should NOT have hacked into the poll.
    I think he should be excluded from the elections.

    Reply
  27. мя ∂єє∂ℓє∂σσ Avatar
    мя ∂єє∂ℓє∂σσ

    Oagal, there’s alwas been a questions I’ve always been asking –

    Do all running leaders/parties, have to be Democrats? Can’t a leader choose to have a different government? (ex. Monarchy, Republic, Democracy, Anarchy).

    Corruption..

    -Dee
    Oagal: They can reorganize the structure of the ACP–other than the infinite power of Oagal and Boomer :)–unless it harms the ACP.

    Reply
  28. мя ∂єє∂ℓє∂σσ Avatar
    мя ∂єє∂ℓє∂σσ

    Always*
    Question*

    Reply
  29. bluenev1 Avatar
    bluenev1

    i agree

    Reply
  30. jedimaster17 Avatar
    jedimaster17

    Anarchy means no government.
    Republic and Democracy are similar in basis in that at least part of the people have an impact on the government.
    Monarchy is against the constitution of the ACP.
    Just because its a different coalition, or ruling party does not mean that they can ignore established practice.
    ~Jedi

    Fox: A simpler defintion of anarchy is this:

    “YAHH SHOOT PEOPLE SHOOT PEOPLE YAHHH”

    And honestly, it’s sad it’s like that, because it just shows how evil and corrupt some human beings are.

    Oagal: Locke and Hobbs said it in their days—people naturally tend towards anarchy. That’s why government (more specifically powerful government, which sometimes is monarchy) is necessary.

    Reply
  31. Guymed Avatar
    Guymed

    ACP is hectically out of controll. Monarchy seems to be what this “bill” means.

    Reply
  32. cpsif Avatar
    cpsif

    I agree, but –

    Giving Oagal and Boom erpower could cause trouble. I think if you want a rebellion, you should do it proffesionally, but not give 2 peope “the right” to sack people.

    Fox: I agree with this part. Having two people with power to select a leader (Or to clarify, one person with that power and one person who just thought he had that power. Sorry Oagal :mrgreen:) has caused trouble in the past. I think it should be the decision of:

    1. Oagal
    2. Boomer
    3. Senate

    IF the past leader was a total moron.

    ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~

    Oagal: (ignoring that one part :roll:) It has been proven that Boomer and I only care about the wellbeing of the ACP—why else would we still be here? We have lives to live, ya know!

    I think if you want a leader to be overthrown there must be a unanimous or close to unamous (10/10, 9/10, 8/10) vote by the senate for tht leader to be overthrown. If the leader does not accept his sacking, a rebellion force will be made. A legal rebellion force.

    Twingy
    Oagal: That would cause more leadership rebellions and internal turmoil than ever before. 🙄

    Reply
  33. courtluuvsyuu Avatar
    courtluuvsyuu

    I’M NAKED 😛 LOL!! NICE MEATY BOO

    Reply
  34. ~βã↑ιη↑Γéη€Ηé™ The ACP Div Gen Avatar
    ~βã↑ιη↑Γéη€Ηé™ The ACP Div Gen

    Yes Dee no president of the United States would make their country into a Monarchy or Communism in the near future because bills are set to accomodate the protection of the republic and democracy. (Hehe I sounded Intelligamentinatint)

    Reply
  35. tomtwelve Avatar
    tomtwelve

    “Meat, I’m happy for ya, I’mma let you finish, but Flappy had one of the best hacks OF ALL TIME! OF ALL TIME!”
    -kanye west

    Reply
  36. tomtwelve Avatar
    tomtwelve

    (yeah uh, if you don’t get that, then click on this http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/kanye-interrupts-imma-let-you-finish because this joke is everywhere!! :mrgreen: )

    the last few leaders sorta were picked monarchy-style. the second-in-command became leader. and that sure didn’t work. i mean, no one said that the 2nd in command was next in line. you can choose someone else. and they should have chosen someone else, obviously.
    Oagal: …which is why, if things go wrong, Boomer and I have the final say. 😕

    Reply
  37. Flappy27923 Avatar
    Flappy27923

    Oh. Thanks. I think…

    Reply
  38. «●●●ƒσχтαιℓѕ●●●» Avatar
    «●●●ƒσχтαιℓѕ●●●»

    Hey guys, I know that Dry is intolerant of me editing his comments with my response ( 🙄 ) so is there any way you can enable replies to comments? We do it on my site all the time :mrgreen:

    Reply
  39. tomtwelve Avatar
    tomtwelve

    i don’t think this site design allows that.

    Reply
  40. Shall not be known Avatar
    Shall not be known

    this bill will only hurt in the long run…………… just wait and you will see what i mean

    Reply
  41. danny Avatar
    danny

    sorry soldiers but i got to hurry cuz im grounded im sorry and only 3 more days till the anniversery or should i say 4th anniversery well im so sorry soldiers that im grounded bye dont worry im coming on tomrrow bye

    Reply
  42. danny Avatar
    danny

    🙁

    Reply
  43. steveladd Avatar
    steveladd

    why so said

    Reply
  44. mrchips10 Avatar
    mrchips10

    lol

    Reply
  45. tomtwelve Avatar
    tomtwelve

    precisely…

    Reply
  46. pokecatch Avatar
    pokecatch

    lol ” i’m awsome B-)” *cough* cough*

    Reply
  47. Lsund Avatar
    Lsund

    Woah….. I just may be allowed to come on chat soon! maybe sometime this week! Im showing my parents the Ignore list, and how theres no predators on chat except well uh…… I Forgot :mrgreen: (Meat) Anyway, keep ur fingers crossed!
    ~Love….. YOUR MOM

    Reply
  48. freddy257 Avatar
    freddy257

    fox it could be great minds think alike or simple minds never differ XD jk

    Reply
  49. zack3166 Avatar
    zack3166

    Lsund it would be great to see you 😉

    Reply
  50. 23456 Avatar
    23456

    how do you get the pic at the top of the screen?

    Reply
  51. twingy Avatar
    twingy

    My comment got edited (goo)

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Loading…
0:00 −0:00