Recently I’ve been hearing terms people often associate with ACP any time someone tries to have an opinion. From “world police” to “ACP controls everyone”, ACP always takes the blame whenever an opinion is involved. Recently, it was said that ACP would declare war on armies that did not fire Flappy. Let me make it clear, that was NOT our rule. That was part of the Anti-Bot Bill, written by Person of the Nachos. In Flappy’s case:
“One month suspension from armies you are ranked in, or being fired. Punishment severity is determined by Leaders of the army.” – [You can decide whether to fire him or just suspend him, that is the severity part. Not punishing him was not an option].
To start with, all the armies that complained about us “forcing” them to fire him, you all signed that bill. All we did was point out that clause, and for those who considered ignoring it, you would be in violation of the bill. If it’s the bill you had a problem with, talk to Person about. We’re sorry for trying to stand up for a bill that we thought everyone agreed on and was written by an ally of ours. Maybe next time, we’ll be a little less fair 🙄 .
At this point, basically everyone had fired Flappy except for perhaps WW, although they (leaders other than Wii) changed the decision. I may not be ACP Leader anymore, but it is my belief that we’re not looking for a huge war over this, we were only looking to uphold the bill. If you didn’t like us “controlling” your decisions, you really either have an issue with the bill for telling you what to do, or you just have some sort of bias against ACP (fairly likely in many cases). We can have a meeting to revise the bill if that’s what you want.
Once again, sorry for wanting to uphold the rules like decent people, I guess we’ll be a bit more irrational next time… (That was sarcasm) 😛 . Come on guys, stop worrying about everything. Let’s just have some fun.
~Boomer
