ACP HAS WON THE WAR. INFO AT THE BOTTOM.
Defense of Breeze[Victory]
Words cannot describe what happened in this battle. But we can give a list of reason why we successfully defended Breeze from our “allies”. First off, WW had LT members helping them. Secondly, WW did not follow the defenders for a large portion of the battle. And finally, if we were going by the “room capture” rule, ACP won Plaza and Mine shack while tying at Berg. The Town counted as part of the pre-battle, WW. ACP maxed around 23 and averaged 20.

At some point in the battle, both chats had glitched. Little damage was done to ACP who kept destroying WW.

WW were using allies, including Spi and Waterkid (who are not boxed in this picture)
To summarize: WW used LT and WN to try and beat us. And they still failed. This clearly shows who’s the better army.
Defense of Crunch [Invalid]
At around 6:50 pm est, Friday September 27th, Waterkid PC’d me saying that he had included Crunch into the invasions against ACP. I went to check their site, and saw that they had put the invasion for Sunday September 29th. (They put the 30th, all their dates were a day off). It is true that Water had commented at 4 PM GMT Friday with Crunch included, but they had planned it for Sunday. They then changed the date to Saturday, September 28th sometime later, well before the 24 hour warning. Since LT’s invasion for Crunch is invalid, ACP keeps the server and the score is still 0-0.
Defense of Breeze [Victory]
We faced off against LT for the first time in this war. The battle was on Breeze after LT tried to place it in Klondike for absolutely no good reason. The fight wasn’t exciting but it still became an ACP Victory. Why? Well after having a highly intelligent conversation with Water, I was informed that there aren’t any rules in CP Warfare.
During the DW war, we lost an invasion against them for not following DW to different rooms. We acknowledged that we broke Clause 1 of the server invasion rules and admitted defeat.
§ 3. Winning an Invasion
The following rules must be regarded when declaring victory in an invasion.
Clause 1: Consistent Pursuit Rule
Invading armies must seek out the defending army during the invasion. Blatant attempts to avoid fighting the defending army directly will result in an unsuccessful invasion. Invading armies must attempt to attack the defending army head-on throughout the battle and either force them to regroup, retreat, or surrender.
For approximately 10 minutes, LT left the Town and headed for the Berg, leaving ACP by ourselves. This happened again near the end; ACP were at Ski Hill while LT went to the Berg.
Pictures of the battle![]()
![]()
![]()
Since apparently there aren’t any rules in CP Warfare, ACP claims all of LT’s servers and has won the war. Congratulations ACP.
In all seriousness, we’re trying to be honest here, we’re trying not to start a flame war. But both WW and LT keep making it difficult for us. You know where to find us if you want to talk things out.
Comment if you came!
~Jerry
Filed under: ACP |
Made it to both
http://ltlighttroopshq.wordpress.com/2013/09/29/response-to-acps-results-to-those-2-battles/
Made it to the last event.
Made it to first- and the pre-event of the second.
made it to the first event
Camezies to the Defence of Breeze! Good job, ACP!
Made it to one
Came to every one!
Made the first one!
biased idiot. You cant win a war with a pathetic ‘Defense’ PSSHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAA
Lolwut.
You did a pathetic defense and then said you won. XD Also,your latest defense of vanilla was invalid because you used one major army and a sub-major army to help you.
came, good job acp!
i was at defence of breeze