Why We Invaded Mammoth (Sparknotes Version) – See Bottom of the Post
Unless UMA calls it off because Mammoth is no longer neutral, we will be defending from an invasion tomorrow (Saturday) on Mammoth. ACP vs. UMA on Mammoth, like old times. Here is the info:
When: Saturday, December 26, 2009
Where: Mammoth Snow Forts
Chat: ACP Chat
Times:
2:30 pm PST
3:30 pm MST
4:30 pm CST
5:30 pm EST
10:30 pm U.K.
Comment if you can make it!
~Boomer
Why We Invaded Mammoth (Sparknotes Version)
If UMA invaded, chances are the first major army who invaded would win (that’s not a war). You need an army with a chance to hold on to it in charge of it, like ACP did for years before it became neutral, otherwise it’s just a series of invasions (once again does nothing to provide us with the war they were claiming this would cause). UMA said by invading they would be saving CP Warfare, but when we invaded it, they said we were destroying it. Now UMA is still invading, therefore we gave them the war for Mammoth they wanted, so the only logical explanation for them complaining is that they don’t have a free shot at Mammoth like they thought all week. We also wanted to divide the armies into a potential war situation by allowing IW and the Nachos (soon to be others) access to Mammoth, creating some separation, as well as a stronger alliance with the Big 3. If any major army leaders want to talk about it, I can probably give a better explanation in person.
Batin Edit: I do not know if I will be able to make it, as my family and I are still on a trip until Monday and the next few days we will be very busy. However, as SOON as I get home I PROMISE YOU thaat I will get really active, as it very much bugs me that I have not been for a couple weeks.
Thom: I cannot make it because I have to celebrate Christmas with my dad’s side of the family today. I will be on tomorrow morning and do some type of unscheduled event, but please don’t think I’m inactive if I don’t really get on Sunday afternoon because I also have more family activities.