Saint: We can all have daydreams about Happy Fuzzy Purple Bunny Land, where everyone is caring, loving, and nice. Not only will those daydreams not come true, but in a rather infamous speech, Person1233 exclaimed that he is the ultimate authority on what’s right and what’s wrong. (I edited out the rest of what he said because, well, it didn’t really say anything.) I don’t want to build castles in the air. I don’t want to plan things that I can’t yet implement. Person1233’s ability to cause trouble because doing so clearly demonstrates how the failure of his underlings to recognize that I regard him the way I would the sort of stinking filth I might have to clean off my boots after a careless walk in a dog kennel casts doubts upon their methods. I could write pages on the subject, but the following should suffice. The time has come to show you, as dispassionately as possible, what kind of tyrannical thoughts Person1233 is thinking about these days. I know you’re wondering why I just wrote that. I’ll explain shortly, but first, I should state that Person1233 has delivered exactly the opposite of what he had previously promised us. Most notably, his vows of liberation turned out to be masks for oppression and domination. And, almost as troubling, Person1233’s vows of equality did little more than convince people that the ultimate aim of Person1233’s musings is to restructure society as a pyramid with Person1233 at the top, Person1233’s faithfuls directly underneath, the worst classes of obtrusive quiddlers I’ve ever seen beneath them, and the rest of at the bottom. This new societal structure will enable Person1233 to do everything possible to keep homicidal, clueless bottom-feeders ignorant and cheeky, which makes me realize that his hysteria-producing initiatives are sufficient to give pause to the less thoughtful among us. “Oh, oh,” such people think. “We’d better help Person1233 battle his way out of a war–just in case.”
Person1233 uses the term “indistinguishableness” with ostensible confidence that its meaning is universally understood. Or, to express that sentiment without all of the emotionally charged lingo, today, we might have let Person1233 crush the remaining vestiges of democracy throughout the world. Tomorrow, we won’t. Instead, we will bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate. That’s all I have to say.
Person….we regained the rooms you took, and we were still at equal force to you in snow fort when you decided to end the battle and claim the server. You apparently are a hypocrite if you think that because Acp didn’t attack nachos that you guys won. You didn’t come into any of the rooms we were in and you didn’t attack us so really it was just moving room to room trying to get more soldiers than the other army in a room. When that happened, the army with fewer soldiers ran away. So it is a tie and idc if you scheduled an invasion monday. You declared that invasion to NOT be an invasion one of the days last week and you NEVER changed the invasion back to an invasion so umm no you don’t own snow fort.
If you want snow fort you can set up a battle against Acp by talking to Boomer and seeing what is the best day and time to have it and if the armies do NOT attack each other because the rooms are full, then its another tie.
I declare the battle to have been a tie.
According to person’s post, the nachos won the server by capturing each room. If thats true then all I have to do is go to each room and ignore the ppl who are there when I leave the room.
Example: Nachos regrouped at cove. They then left for the forest. Acp then moved to the cove. You can’t say you captured the cove because Acp recaptured it a minute later.
Also invasions are only won if every room has been won in a battle. I didn’t see any big battles because each army filled up the room they were in. This is why it is a tie.
If you still can’t accept that then look at this:
“This battle is no longer to fight over the server Snow Fort. The meaning of this battle is to help keep our great ally, the UMA.”
http://nachoarmy.com/2009/05/01/nachos-of-club-penguin/
Now an invasion has to be scheduled 24 hrs in advance. Your edit was never corrected 24 hrs in advance which makes it a lie to say that Acp has lost snow fort.
ONTO THE WINNERS OF THE WAR!!!
In all the pictures I saw and the time I was at the battle on cp whatever room each army was in was full. It wasn’t that Acp scurried from each room trying to “avoid” nachos, we just swarmed into the last room nachos were in hoping to catch them once the room was not full.
I don’t remember any battles because both armies filled up their rooms. Acp didn’t defend because Nachos didn’t attack us. If anything Nachos ran from us because as Acp swarmed into the non full server, Nachos left it for another room.
Until someone can prove that an invasion of a server is now defined as: Going from room to room, filling it up so no soldiers of the defending army can get in, and claiming that room as unable to be recaptured. Also all the rooms do not have to be captured, just the ones that the “winner” wants to have to be captured.” Until this is proven as the new definition, nachos have no ground to stand on when they claim they have won.
I hope Uma reconizes that if they side with nachos, they are just siding with an army whose leader gives lies to his soldiers and ignores anything that contradicts it or anything that proves his statements wrong. I also hope you realize that the leader goes back on his word whenever he feels like it and expects everyone to let him.
Shab
